Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (0.22 vs 1.94, Δ 1.72).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (14 vs 4 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 0.22 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.94Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 376 | Accurate passes | 555Lead |
| 444 | Total passes | 622Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.52 | Goals prevented | -0.52 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.