Match statistics snapshot
- DC United created the clearer chances on xG (0.32 vs 0.59, Δ 0.27).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- DC United was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 0.32 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.59Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 386Lead | Accurate passes | 222 |
| 481Lead | Total passes | 322 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.