Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (2.36 vs 1.10, Δ 1.26).
- DC United fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 2.36Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.10 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 444Lead | Accurate passes | 367 |
| 521Lead | Total passes | 443 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.49 | Goals prevented | -1.49 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.