Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 6%).
- CF Montreal held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 326Lead | Accurate passes | 193 |
| 406Lead | Total passes | 277 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.