Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 59%).
- CF Montreal held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 463Lead | Accurate passes | 197 |
| 530Lead | Total passes | 267 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.