Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (0.18 vs 2.25, Δ 2.07).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 0.18 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.25Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 336 | Accurate passes | 413Lead |
| 424 | Total passes | 498Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.