Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (1.98 vs 2.93, Δ 0.95).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.98 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.93Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 8 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 361 | Accurate passes | 520Lead |
| 423 | Total passes | 591Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 0.32 | Goals prevented | 0.32 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |