Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (2.07 vs 1.72, Δ 0.35).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (20 vs 8 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2.07Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.72 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 323 | Accurate passes | 459Lead |
| 389 | Total passes | 526Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 1.01 | Goals prevented | 1.01 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |