Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (1.68 vs 1.66, Δ 0.02).
- Los Angeles FC fired more attempts (20 vs 13 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.68Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.66 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 7 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 258 | Accurate passes | 480Lead |
| 354 | Total passes | 555Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| 0.42 | Goals prevented | 0.42 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |