Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (1.46 vs 1.20, Δ 0.26).
- Minnesota United FC fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.46Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 299 | Accurate passes | 360Lead |
| 386 | Total passes | 445Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.