Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (0.91 vs 1.03, Δ 0.12).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.91 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.03Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 392 | Accurate passes | 460Lead |
| 470 | Total passes | 540Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Fouls | 3Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.