Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (0.96 vs 1.57, Δ 0.61).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (20 vs 6 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.96 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.57Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 230 | Accurate passes | 490Lead |
| 292 | Total passes | 542Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.32 | Goals prevented | -0.32 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.