Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 20%).
- CF Montreal held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 2 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 367Lead | Accurate passes | 188 |
| 474Lead | Total passes | 289 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |