Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (0.86 vs 0.06, Δ 0.80).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (12 vs 2 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.06 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 392 | Accurate passes | 425Lead |
| 479 | Total passes | 503Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |