Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (0.91 vs 2.20, Δ 1.29).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 0.91 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.20Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 540Lead | Accurate passes | 392 |
| 614Lead | Total passes | 458 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.37 | Goals prevented | 0.37 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.