Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (0.98 vs 1.04, Δ 0.06).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 0.98 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.04Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 381 | Accurate passes | 461Lead |
| 441 | Total passes | 525Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.04 | Goals prevented | 0.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |