Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (0.86 vs 4.03, Δ 3.17).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (21 vs 15 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86 | Expected goals (xG) | 4.03Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 374 | Accurate passes | 475Lead |
| 438 | Total passes | 534Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -0.66 | Goals prevented | -0.66 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.