Match statistics snapshot
- New York Red Bulls created the clearer chances on xG (1.96 vs 2.58, Δ 0.62).
- New York Red Bulls fired more attempts (24 vs 8 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 1.96 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.58Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 384Lead | Accurate passes | 350 |
| 464Lead | Total passes | 409 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.07 | Goals prevented | -0.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.