Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.51 vs 1.52, Δ 0.01).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (8 vs 7 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.51 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.52Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 473Lead | Accurate passes | 406 |
| 562Lead | Total passes | 505 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.