Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (1.33 vs 0.62, Δ 0.71).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (21 vs 8 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.33Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 364Lead | Accurate passes | 331 |
| 421Lead | Total passes | 384 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.05 | Goals prevented | 0.05 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |