Match statistics snapshot
- Philadelphia Union created the clearer chances on xG (0.96 vs 1.07, Δ 0.11).
- Philadelphia Union fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 0.96 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.07Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 240Lead | Accurate passes | 235 |
| 341Lead | Total passes | 328 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.76 | Goals prevented | 0.76 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.