Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (1.83 vs 1.99, Δ 0.16).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (22 vs 14 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (32% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.83 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.99Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 369 | Accurate passes | 514Lead |
| 426 | Total passes | 568Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.60 | Goals prevented | 0.60 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.