Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (1.28 vs 0.96, Δ 0.32).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- Toronto FC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.28Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 470Lead | Accurate passes | 399 |
| 546Lead | Total passes | 466 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.04 | Goals prevented | 0.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cf Montreal | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |