Match statistics snapshot
- CFR 1907 Cluj created the clearer chances on xG (2.03 vs 0.29, Δ 1.74).
- CFR 1907 Cluj fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- CFR 1907 Cluj was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 2.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.29 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 390Lead | Accurate passes | 355 |
| 461Lead | Total passes | 426 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.