Match statistics snapshot
- Dinamo Bucuresti created the clearer chances on xG (1.16 vs 1.26, Δ 0.10).
- Dinamo Bucuresti fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Dinamo Bucuresti was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.26Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 311 | Accurate passes | 444Lead |
| 397 | Total passes | 512Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.