Match statistics snapshot
- CFR 1907 Cluj fired more attempts (7 vs 3 shots).
- GAZ Metan Medias was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 29%).
- CFR 1907 Cluj held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Gaz Metan Medias |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 7Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Gaz Metan Medias |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Gaz Metan Medias |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Gaz Metan Medias |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Gaz Metan Medias |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.