Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (0.75 vs 1.58, Δ 0.83).
- Rapid fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Rapid was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 0.75 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.58Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 489Lead | Accurate passes | 201 |
| 597Lead | Total passes | 309 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.