Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (0.89 vs 1.78, Δ 0.89).
- Rapid fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- CFR 1907 Cluj was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 39%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 0.89 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.78Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 306 | Accurate passes | 386Lead |
| 379 | Total passes | 465Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |