Match statistics snapshot
- CFR 1907 Cluj fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Rapid was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target |
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 353 | Accurate passes | 393Lead |
| 465 | Total passes | 489Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |