Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (0.79 vs 1.04, Δ 0.25).
- CFR 1907 Cluj fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- Rapid was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 0.79 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.04Lead |
| 6 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 256 | Accurate passes | 328Lead |
| 348 | Total passes | 434Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cfr 1907 Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |