Match statistics snapshot
- CFRJ / Maricá fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Bangu was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 27%).
- CFRJ / Maricá held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cfrj / Maricá | Statistic | Bangu |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cfrj / Maricá | Statistic | Bangu |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 316Lead | Accurate passes | 253 |
| 379Lead | Total passes | 325 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cfrj / Maricá | Statistic | Bangu |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cfrj / Maricá | Statistic | Bangu |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cfrj / Maricá | Statistic | Bangu |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.