Match statistics snapshot
- CFRJ / Maricá created the clearer chances on xG (2.27 vs 0.55, Δ 1.72).
- Nova Iguaçu fired more attempts (9 vs 5 shots).
- CFRJ / Maricá was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cfrj / Maricá | Statistic | Nova Iguaçu |
|---|---|---|
| 2.27Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cfrj / Maricá | Statistic | Nova Iguaçu |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 229 | Accurate passes | 411Lead |
| 274 | Total passes | 485Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cfrj / Maricá | Statistic | Nova Iguaçu |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cfrj / Maricá | Statistic | Nova Iguaçu |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cfrj / Maricá | Statistic | Nova Iguaçu |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.