Match statistics snapshot
- Changchun Yatai created the clearer chances on xG (1.63 vs 1.28, Δ 0.35).
- Changchun Yatai fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Beijing Guoan was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Changchun Yatai | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 1.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.28 |
| Offsides | ||
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Changchun Yatai | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 211 | Accurate passes | 228Lead |
| 291 | Total passes | 314Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Changchun Yatai | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Changchun Yatai | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Changchun Yatai | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.