Match statistics snapshot
- Amazonas fired more attempts (20 vs 10 shots).
- Chapecoense-sc was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 25%).
- Amazonas held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 14Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 263 | Accurate passes | 401Lead |
| 343 | Total passes | 477Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |