Match statistics snapshot
- Botafogo fired more attempts (22 vs 11 shots).
- Botafogo was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 27%).
- Botafogo held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
3 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 0Lead |
8 | Shots inside the box | 19Lead |
4 | Shots off target | 11Lead |
3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
11 | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 22Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
77% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
212 | Accurate passes | 445Lead |
277 | Total passes | 529Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
4Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 3 |
8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Botafogo leads this block
Botafogo leads shot accuracy (+33% vs Chapecoense-sc)
Botafogo leads shot accuracy (+33% vs Chapecoense-sc)
Botafogo leads box penetration (+19% vs Chapecoense-sc)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Botafogo leads this block
Chapecoense-sc — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Chapecoense-sc — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Botafogo leads this block
Botafogo leads territorial pressure (+100% vs Chapecoense-sc)
Botafogo leads territorial pressure (+100% vs Chapecoense-sc)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Chapecoense-sc leads (22.0 vs 12.0).
Botafogo leads (55.4 vs 26.2).
Botafogo leads (26.0 vs 13.0).
Chapecoense-sc leads (21.0 vs 14.0).