Match statistics snapshot
- Chapecoense-sc fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Coritiba was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 43%).
- Coritiba held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 212 | Accurate passes | 357Lead |
| 278 | Total passes | 421Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |