Match statistics snapshot
- Chapecoense-sc fired more attempts (23 vs 14 shots).
- Coritiba was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 22%).
- Chapecoense-sc held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 9 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 359Lead | Accurate passes | 326 |
| 430Lead | Total passes | 385 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.