Match statistics snapshot
- CRB created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 1.07, Δ 0.01).
- CRB fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Chapecoense-sc was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Crb |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.07Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Crb |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 387 | Accurate passes | 418Lead |
| 463 | Total passes | 483Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Crb |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Crb |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Crb |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |