Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 17%).
- Chapecoense-sc held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 301Lead | Accurate passes | 259 |
| 387Lead | Total passes | 339 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |