Match statistics snapshot
- Chapecoense-sc fired more attempts (19 vs 15 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 16%).
- Criciuma held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 272 | Accurate passes | 395Lead |
| 355 | Total passes | 476Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 17Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |