Match statistics snapshot
- Chapecoense-sc created the clearer chances on xG (0.98 vs 0.86, Δ 0.12).
- Chapecoense-sc fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Flamengo was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.98Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.86 |
| Offsides | ||
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 320 | Accurate passes | 617Lead |
| 378 | Total passes | 683Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 1.17 | Goals prevented | 1.17 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.