Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (0.59 vs 1.44, Δ 0.85).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Chapecoense-sc was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 0.59 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.44Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
| 6 | Total shots | 16Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 26% | Ball possession | 74%Lead |
| 195 | Accurate passes | 672Lead |
| 253 | Total passes | 730Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Additional tracked metrics for this fixture.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Free Kicks | 12 |