Match statistics snapshot
- Londrina fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Londrina was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 11%).
- Chapecoense-sc held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Londrina |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 7 | Shots off target | 7 |
| 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Londrina |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 323Lead | Accurate passes | 171 |
| 401Lead | Total passes | 248 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Londrina |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Londrina |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Londrina |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 17Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.