Match statistics snapshot
- Mirassol fired more attempts (18 vs 9 shots).
- Mirassol held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 286 | Accurate passes | 440Lead |
| 352 | Total passes | 509Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 18Lead | Fouls | 23 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.