Match statistics snapshot
- Mirassol created the clearer chances on xG (0.54 vs 2.19, Δ 1.65).
- Mirassol fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Mirassol held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 0.54 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.19Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 362 | Accurate passes | 442Lead |
| 437 | Total passes | 494Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.12 | Goals prevented | -0.12 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |