Match statistics snapshot
- Chapecoense-sc created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 0.95, Δ 0.52).
- Novorizontino fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
- Chapecoense-sc was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 6%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.95 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 303 | Accurate passes | 323Lead |
| 371 | Total passes | 392Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.