Match statistics snapshot
- Chapecoense-sc fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Operario-PR was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 20%).
- Operario-PR held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 241 | Accurate passes | 312Lead |
| 329 | Total passes | 414Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.