Match statistics snapshot
- Operario-PR fired more attempts (15 vs 5 shots).
- Chapecoense-sc was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target |
| 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 311 | Accurate passes | 347Lead |
| 383 | Total passes | 401Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 18Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.