Match statistics snapshot
- Ponte Preta fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Chapecoense-sc was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 42%).
- Chapecoense-sc held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Ponte Preta |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Ponte Preta |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 349Lead | Accurate passes | 261 |
| 455Lead | Total passes | 362 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Ponte Preta |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Ponte Preta |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Ponte Preta |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |