Match statistics snapshot
- Chapecoense-sc created the clearer chances on xG (2.35 vs 0.35, Δ 2.00).
- Chapecoense-sc fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Chapecoense-sc was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.35 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 316 | Accurate passes | 367Lead |
| 381 | Total passes | 438Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chapecoense-sc | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.